[MD] Metaphysics and the mystic.

[118]

Joe,
All I suggested is that you define DQ as "that which you experience".  This was your suggestion.  You can leave it at that and not define any more because we know what you mean.

Sent laboriously from an iPhone,
Mark

On Feb 1, 2012, at 11:47 AM, Joseph  Maurer <jhmau at comcast.net> wrote:

> Hi Mark and all,
> 
> I can't define the experience of DQ since the experience of the indefinable
> is indefinable.  To what faculty for knowledge do I appeal?  Emotions?  I
> will never know DQ!  Emotions format reality in metaphysics?  Go girl!  The
> beginning slice for metaphysical description cannot be spoken.
> 
> There seems to be something wrong with the logic in that sentence.  The
> problem seems to be that existence comes in levels which are definable and
> indefinable.  What a cesspool!
> 
> What is indefinable existence?  When I broaden my metaphysics to DQ is
> indefinable I am flirting with DQ is unknowable except, maybe the first
> slice of knowledge is /SQ.
> 
> If I start slicing reality by evolution can I posit an indefinable level?
> My opinion is that definability is not resolvable by a logic DQ/SQ
> metaphysics!  The space / between DQ/SQ is indefinable/definable experience.
> That seems to be a contradiction.  It is certainly indefinable!
> 
> Joe  
> 
> 
> On 1/31/12 11:23 AM, "118" <ununoctiums at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> You could perhaps define DQ as "something which you experience"
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html