[MD] Metaphysics and the mystic.

[David Harding]

Hi Joe,

> This is the way I conceive DQ!
> 
> IMHO There can be no conception of DQ alone. Evolution is DQ/SQ. When I
> place DQ in a sentence I am embodying reality in a concept SQ which is
> definable, and is only DQ by analogy. Evolution already has occurred. DQ
> is only analogous. There are no words for DQ.

I think its about perspective. The two perspectives of the MOQ.. I agree there aren't any words for DQ. But here we are talking about DQ and using the word DQ. Thus there are words for Dynamic Quality. This is the sq ordinary everyday language kind of perspective.  But then of course these words aren't it.. For we both know words can't describe it. This is the perspective of DQ.
> Placing DQ in the beginning mind of consciousness in metaphysics is analogy
> since it is indefinable. 
> 
> 


Yes. Using the word DQ both is and is not a definition depending on your perspective.
 
> DQ is analogous to faith in an individual. What
> is logic? Logic follows evolution. DQ is perceptible and I am responsible
> for my actions. Evolution sniffs the trail of DQ.
> 
> 

 I'm not sure what you mean here exactly. Can you write about this more perhaps and maybe then I can understand what you mean?
> There are a whole lot of analogies in metaphysics, but woe to the person of
> physics who feels he can conceive indefinable DQ.
> 
> 

Yeah. But it helps if you point out its not something you think of, it's something you experience!

> Hopefully the consciousness that responds to DQ has done a lot of homework
> otherwise physics and metaphysics are in the same boat.
> 
> 

Well in the end, they both are in the same boat. Metaphysics informs how we use physics. 
 
-David