[MD] Truth and Relativity 2.0

[MarshaV]

Hi david,

I think (conventionally speaking, of course) that truths are static patterns.  RMP has stated that static quality represent everything that can be conceptualized, which indicates an interdependence with consciousness.  (Not patterns equal thoughts or ideas, but a dependency.)  Static patterns (conventional truths) may be ranked according to their placement within the MoQ's evolutionary, hierarchical structure: inorganic, biological, social and intellectual.  Explain how the ranking would be accomplished without the individual?  

The definition of truths that I use:

truths noun
2. conformity with fact or reality; verity: _the truth of a statement_.

How do you define truths?


 Marsha


p.s.  Please bare with me.  Sunday morning my hard drive failed, so my iMac is getting a hd transplant and I seem to be coming down with the flu; due I'm sure to spending time with my grandson.  Anyway, I'm a little off. 



On Feb 6, 2012, at 6:47 PM, David Harding <davidjharding at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Marsha,
> 
>> I take truths to be static patterns, so in the MoQ truth is relative to an individual's static pattern history and the dynamic quality in the present event.
> 
> I think truths can be ranked based on how good they are; independent of the individual.  In other words, Quality truly is universal.  
> 
> In fact, I think that the term 'individual' is just a convenient one to use for static patterns of the past.  Truth is in no way bound by these patterns as you seem to imply. 
> 
> -David.
>