[MD] Truth and Relativity 2.0
David Harding
davidjharding at gmail.com
Tue Feb 7 03:17:17 PST 2012
Hi Marsha,
I agree. Truths are static patterns. Static intellectual patterns to be precise. Your definition of truth from the dictionary is also one that I agree with. More below..
> I think (conventionally speaking, of course) that truths are static patterns.
>
>
>
I agree.
> RMP has stated that static quality represent everything that can be conceptualized, which indicates an interdependence with consciousness. (Not patterns equal thoughts or ideas, but a dependency.)
>
>
>
Well here I think that static quality is thoughts and ideas, while consciousness is these thoughts and ideas being capable of responding to DQ.
Remember the debate between the materialists and the idealists? The idealists won. There isn't anything you can think of which isn't from a human perspective. Consciousness is an idea(that I've just defined) not a physical thing.
In other words, it's not so much an interdependence, rather consciousness IS sq. But it is sq capable of responding to DQ.
> Static patterns (conventional truths) may be ranked according to their placement within the MoQ's evolutionary, hierarchical structure: inorganic, biological, social and intellectual. Explain how the ranking would be accomplished without the individual?
>
>
>
I should be clear here and say that I don't claim that ranking can occur without an individual, what I do claim however is that the quality of the ranking is independent of the individual. Everyone knows what quality is. The reason why we disagree is because we have each had a different life experience. People who have had a similar life experience will hold similar values.
Therefore, because quality is before the individual - how good something is, goes before everything. Before even the MOQ. Remember how the MOQ is open to be replaced by something better? This structure isn't the be all and end all of ranking structures.
> The definition of truths that I use:
>
> truths noun
> 2. conformity with fact or reality; verity: _the truth of a statement_.
>
> How do you define truths?
>
The same way.
> p.s. Please bare with me. Sunday morning my hard drive failed, so my iMac is getting a hd transplant and I seem to be coming down with the flu; due I'm sure to spending time with my grandson. Anyway, I'm a little off.
>
>
>
That's okay. Take care Marsha!
-David.
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list