[MD] Truth and Relativity 2.0

[118]

Hi Joe,

Well said.  This is kind of why I protest about Marsha's patterns.
She is unraveling everything into patterns, as if that makes it more
meaningful.  I suppose it is OK for a first cut, but it requires a
little more convincing from her side why that should be the
fundamental ground of understanding.  I deal with patterns as part of
my scientific job.  I do not see them as the basis for everything.  I
just see them as a useful tool which we create to be able to
extrapolate.

The reason I requested unraveling, is that I am completely lost with
Marsha's metaphysical logic.  I am hoping that if I find how the
string turns within the knot, it will make more sense to me.  So, it
is with the possibility of understanding that I make my request of
David.  I certainly have not gotten anywhere in my discussions with
her.

Does this make sense?

Cheers,
Mark

On 2/7/12, Joseph  Maurer <jhmau at comcast.net> wrote:
> Hi Mark and all,
>
> Why do you feel you have to unravel something before you understand what it
> is?  That seems to be throwing the baby out with the bathwater.
>
> Joe
>
>
> On 2/7/12 1:01 PM, "118" <ununoctiums at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I hope you have more luck than I in unraveling this mess she presents.
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>