[MD] Truth and Relativity 2.0

[118]

On 2/8/12, Joseph  Maurer <jhmau at comcast.net> wrote:
> Hi Mark and All,
>
> Woman/Man!  Female/Male.  It would seem, given the reality of conception and
> birth on this planet, that these would be easy concepts for different
> realities.  DQ/SQ is without gender.  Gender is not metaphysical?  I am not
> about to agree that I think like a woman!  Typical male response!

Mark:
Perhaps I think like a woman, I really do not know.

>
> For myself I keep running into emotions.  Can I say that women have a
> clearer metaphysics for emotions than men?  Certainly different
> distractions!  I would not use the word 'deeper' but there sure as hell is a
> difference.  Viva la difference!!!!!!!
> DQ/SQ opens the door to individuality and emphasis.  In the quiet time
> Marsha is so beautiful!  And I find myself with tears in my eyes!  But,
> then, Louise passed and I can't ask her.  I guess I am just lonely!

Not to worry Joe, the internet is full of avatars just like you and
me.  We have a grand ol' time shooting the breeze with our opinions.
You are beautiful as well.  Hang in there.  Emotions are good, no need
to fight them.  They remind me I am alive.  What a great reminder!

Mark
>
> Joe
>
>
>
> On 2/7/12 3:33 PM, "118" <ununoctiums at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The reason I requested unraveling, is that I am completely lost with
>> Marsha's metaphysical logic.  I am hoping that if I find how the
>> string turns within the knot, it will make more sense to me.  So, it
>> is with the possibility of understanding that I make my request of
>> David.  I certainly have not gotten anywhere in my discussions with
>> her.
>>
>> Does this make sense?
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>