[MD] Truth and Relativity 2.0

[MarshaV]

Hi David,


>>> David:
>>> Any change for the better is a result of DQ and not the static patterns of that person as static patterns cannot contain DQ.. As I said above - a unique individual is just a unique collection of patterns from the past. There are many people who share many values however so the patterns aren't unique to just one individual but a particular collection of patterns is…  
>> 
>> Marsha:
>> My definition of the individual or self is as a flow of ever-changing, conditionally co-dependent, impermanent and conceptualized static patterns of inorganic, biological, social and intellectual value in the infinite field of Dynamic Quality.
> 
> David:
> Once again, this is why we're having this discussion, because I disagree with this statement and want to talk to you about it.  


Marsha:
You cannot think that offering your different opinion refutes my claim that static patterns of value are co-dependent?  It doesn't.  If restating my view was annoying to you, you might consider I found no argument against it.  -  Maybe you should give some reason for you disagreement, especially since you have agreed their is no fixed-reference-point.  If static patterns of value are not conditionally co-dependent on causes, conditions and preferences and may be a further cause, condition or preference for another pattern, than what?  Fixed?  Independent?  A sweeping statement about betterment being the results of DQ states nothing.  I haven't denied the relationship with DQ.  In fact I state "in an infinite field of Dynamic Quality."  What kind of betterment?  And on who's judgement?  Social/cultural judgements?  Ego judgements?   Since Dynamic Quality is indeterminate, it doesn't necessarily come with a label describing how things are better.


Marsha