[MD] Tweaking the emergence

[118]

Hi Joe,
I am not sure what you are asking.  They are all common.  What do you
mean by most?

Hopefully it is not through words.

Cheers,
Mark

On 2/28/12, Joseph  Maurer <jhmau at comcast.net> wrote:
> Hi Mark and All,
>
> What are the most common approaches to experiencing reality?  Touch in a
> spectrum from gas to liquid to solid, soft to rigid.  Sight in a color
> spectrum from infra red to ultra violet.  Sound in a scale Do RE MI_FA Sol
> La Ti_DO repeating at doubled intensity ad infinitum?.
>
> Imho when the scale of measurement is infinite, knowledge is indefinable and
> a metaphysics of DQ/Sq as the measure for reality is without boundaries, and
> logic is no arbiter.
>
> I assume that even the indefinable is not infinite but follows a schema like
> a musical scale for sound. Or a color scale for sight.  A scale between
> hard/soft, solid liquid, cold/hot for touch.
>
> Is evolution understandable as templates in consciousness like the musical
> scale, color spectrum, or a gas, liquid, solid touch scale?
>
>
> On 2/25/12 10:40 PM, "118" <ununoctiums at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> My thoughts on this are that the presentations of levels should be
>> consistent with the metaphysics being presented.  MoQ uses one set of
>> levels, and science metaphysics uses another.  It would all depend on
>> what point is being made.
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>