[MD] Tweaking the emergence

[118]

Tuukka,
Why are you resorting to math?  You claimed in a previous post that
physics was primitive, or something.  Are you saying that math and
physics are not one and the same?
Mark

On 2/29/12, Tuukka Virtaperko <mail at tuukkavirtaperko.net> wrote:
> Marsha,
> no, it's not me. It's my friend, who says that's the proper mathematical
> expression for what we are trying to say here. Being someone who ranked
> #44 in a math competition with 2.5 million participants, he probably
> knows a thing or two about maths and logic.
>
> Who's stuck here, anyway? I mean, which one of the two of us sounds more
> like a parrot?
>
> -Tuukka
>
>
>
> 29.2.2012 14:16, MarshaV kirjoitti:
>>
>>
>> Tuukka,
>>
>> "Nonrelativizably"?  It is you who are exhibiting stuckness in some
>> post-modern philosophical,  muddled thinking (words and concepts), or is
>> it Plato's distortion.  Either way it is stuckness.  You are stuck in your
>> representation of relativity.  Let go of that.  That understanding is
>> static.  Move on.
>>
>> Quality may be compared to quantum physics's nonlocality.  Statics quality
>> exists in stable patterns relative to other patterns.  Patterns have no
>> independent existence.
>>
>>
>> Marsha
>>
>>
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>