[MD] The dirty doors of perception?

[118]

On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Joseph  Maurer <jhmau at comcast.net> wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Can I conceptualize will following the template provided by the intellect?
> How would will ever recognize such a template?  A cart before the horse
> problem since will determines my actions while psychology describes them.
> Determination follows description follows reality.

I think that you can represent Will with the intellect.  I am not sure
if recognition is an element of substance.  Sure it can be considered
as the cart before the horse.  I prefer to think of it as reflection.
The reflection is only a reflection.
>
> Evolution as levels in existence opens a door by questioning whether one
> size existence fits all.  For myself I try to prefer a definition for
> evolution to follow the realization of levels in existence.  Man and woman
> are different yet determined in human existence.  Existence is meaningful!

That definition is fine by me.
>
> Adding sentience to the nature of existence becomes a stretch!

Well, all I can say is that we did not get our sentience out of the
blue.  We are not Gods.  I suppose it all depends on how one defines
sentience.  Human sentience could be one form of sentience.

Mark
>
>
> On 2/29/12 2:48 PM, "118" <ununoctiums at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Modern
>> psychology is stuck in the evolution paradigm, so it is easy to see
>> where it will end up.  In a dead niche somewhere due to
>> overspecialization...
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html