[MD] relative

[Joseph Maurer]

Hi Tuukka and all,

I do not know what you mean by conventional truth in a university setting?
DQ/SQ as metaphysical reality accepts that that we experience and know the
indefinable and the definable.  If the uni accepts SOM only, indefinable DQ
is not a teachable principle.  I do not know how you are distinguishing
"conventional truth" and "metaphysical truth".

Certainly in a course on mathematics they cannot appeal to evolution since
they are not teaching metaphysics.  Mathematics is not a metaphysical
discipline.  IMHO Logic has to embrace mathematics and metaphysics DQ/SQ in
communication and learning.

Joe 


On 1/7/12 12:35 PM, "Tuukka Virtaperko" <mail at tuukkavirtaperko.net> wrote:

> I didn't say that's what you're saying. I just wanted to point that out. 
IF
> we want to talk to the Uni or people who insist on conventional 
truth, that's
> what we have to say to them. They don't WANT to hear about 
DQ in that form,
> maybe because they are afraid of it, and we can't just 
shove that down their
> throats. Better try to find a common ground. I'm 
sure many people are afraid
> of DQ even though they don't have a word for 
it. And if you spend enough time
> with someone, maybe you come up with a 
non-threatening way of talking about
> DQ to them.