[MD] relative

MarshaV valkyr at att.net
Sat Jan 7 16:58:12 PST 2012


Tuukka,

You gotta find it much more difficult to explain your own system (chart and article), than to get side-tracked focusing of Buddhism's "relative truths". 


Marsha


On Jan 7, 2012, at 7:03 PM, Tuukka Virtaperko <mail at tuukkavirtaperko.net> wrote:

> Marsha,
> you gotta have poor self-esteem or something as to interpret that what you said didn't work for me.
> 
> -Tuukka
> 
> 
> 
> 8.1.2012 1:14, MarshaV kirjoitti:
>> Tuukka,
>> 
>> I suppose your certainty is a Western attitude, but I do wonder on what it is based?  You know all about the future for the West, the Uni, and Western scholars.  That's quite remarkable!   So glad to have given you the opportunity to offer such great foresight and wisdom.  Your brilliance is amazing.  But to repeat what I wrote yesterday, my explorations and definition of 'static patterns of value' are based on my understanding of static quality and Buddhism's conventional (relative) truths.  If it doesn't work for you, please ignore it.  I'll do the same with what you present.  Thanks.
>> 
>> 
>> Marsha
>> 
>> 



More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list