[MD] Idealistic static value patterns

[118]

Hi Tuukka,

On 1/12/12, mail at tuukkavirtaperko.net <mail at tuukkavirtaperko.net> wrote:
> Hi Matt! =)
>
> To be sure, the math stuff I'm doing right now... well... it sure
> doesn't work out like that! :D I have to reduce the formulae to tree
> structures to understand what they are about in the first place, and I
> don't, at least not yet, do that completely intuitively.
>
> If you're a math geek, you'll like this:
>
> http://www.moq.fi/?p=242
>
> =)
>
Mark:
I took a look at this and did not understand most of it.  It may be
useful for some of us if you provide a common English conclusion of
what the various results mean in terms of MoQ.  Perhaps you could also
define your operators so that we can see what you are doing.  It is
hard to look up those symbols on google :-).

It looks like set theory to me.  The use of set theory to interogate
Quality is interesting since we may be dealing with infinite sets.  I
presented some on this in previous posts, but then lost interest (or
did not get any response) and moved on.  I did get to read several
books on the subject which made it fulfilling for me.  There are
interesting correspondences in infinte sets.  For example, in a right
(pythagorean) triangle the number of points on the hypotenuse is
exactly the same as the number of points on the base.  It is possible
that in the "real world" there are exactly the same amount of points
in each of your quality sets (except maybe your linkistic quality (if
you spelled that as it is supposed to mean).

What we have, however, is a problem with results from Quality
comprising itself in a set.  This would be similar to the "set of all
sets" which in formally invalid.  However, it is true in my opinion
that the set of Quality also contains Quality, so this may be
abstracted by you using a recursive technique (a challenge for you
since I can't present it formally).  So the question is, if Quality is
everything, can it also include itself?

I did note that you are using a combinatorial approach, where the set
would equal n! (or the product of the whole intergers making up n)
minus the intergers themselves.  You would create a kind of table
which would depict that set.  It should be possible to make this table
multi-dimensional to account for all your sub-qualities.

I especially like your linkistic quality.  Perhaps you can tell me
something about that!

Cheers,
Mark

> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>