[MD] relative.

[MarshaV]

Mark,

I already explained that.
 

Marsha


Sent from my iPad

On Jan 13, 2012, at 6:21 PM, 118 <ununoctiums at gmail.com> wrote:

> Marsha,
> What I was asking was, what is truth relative to?  Not what your truth is.
> 
> You provided the statement "truth is seen as relative in his system
> [MoQ]".  I was wondering what you meant by that.
> 
> Thanks,
> Mark
> 
> On 1/13/12, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>> 
>> Mark,
>> 
>> Static patterns of value are processes, conditionally co-dependent,
>> impermanent, ever-changing and conceptualized, that pragmatically tend to
>> persist and change within a stable, predictable pattern.  Within the MoQ,
>> these patterns are categorized into a four-level, evolutionary, hierarchical
>> structure:  inorganic, biological, social and intellectual. Static quality
>> exists in stable patterns relative to other patterns.  Patterns exist
>> relative to innumerable causes and conditions (patterns), relative to parts
>> and the collection of parts (patterns), relative to conceptual designation
>> (patterns). Patterns have no independent, inherent existence.  Further,
>> these patterns pragmatically exist relative to an individual's static
>> pattern of life history.
>> 
>> 
>> Marsha
>> 
>> 
>> On Jan 13, 2012, at 1:01 PM, 118 wrote:
>> 
>>> Marsha,
>>> What is it relative to?
>>> 
>>> Sent laboriously from an iPhone,
>>> Mark
>>> 
>>> On Jan 12, 2012, at 9:11 PM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Mark,
>>>> 
>>>> Again for the umpteenth time, I have not stated that the MoQ is a form of
>>>> Relativism.  I have merely stated that I think the MoQ is
>>>> epistemologically relative, as in "truth is seen as relative in his
>>>> system [MoQ]" from the MoQ Textbook.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Marsha
>>>>