[MD] SOM Problem #6523213: Relativity and Truth

[Tuukka Virtaperko]

David,

Marsha is using the word "relative" in the Buddhist sense. Are you aware 
of that, and what it means?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_truths_doctrine

Wikipedia will be offline in four hours because some politicians are 
trying to ruin our technological future with SOPA and PIPA.


>>> You can prove this logically. There is no distinction between A or B if you cannot say how either of them is different in the absence of the other.
>> And where does the saying that there is a difference come from?  How does that recognition happen?  Where is your logical proof?
> How do we recognise that there is a difference from one thing to another? As I have said, my proofs are experience.  First we notice something and how high or low a quality it is.  Then we can compare this quality to something else. If we never distinguish a difference between A and B, then there isn't an A or B. It's only when we notice a difference between A or B, that is, when something is distinguishable in the absence of the other thing.

Tuukka:

Ohh... forget it. That's not a proof. I thought I should maybe feel 
disappointed, but I don't feel anything special. Please ignore my 
compliments. The compliments were not intended as a response for that 
input. That's rhetoric you are doing there.

-Tuukka