[MD] The first cut.

[MarshaV]

Hi dmb,

Well, to me, static patterns of value are processes, conditionally co-dependent, impermanent, ever-changing and conceptualized, that pragmatically tend to persist and change within a stable, predictable pattern.  Within the MoQ, these patterns are morally categorized into a four-level, evolutionary, hierarchical structure:  inorganic, biological, social and intellectual. Static quality exists in stable patterns relative to other patterns:  patterns depend upon innumerable causes and conditions (patterns), depend upon parts and the collection of parts (patterns), depend upon conceptual designation (patterns). Patterns have no independent, inherent existence.  Further, these patterns pragmatically exist relative to an individual's static pattern of life history.

I guess we disagree.


Marsha




Sent from my iPad

On Jan 18, 2012, at 4:18 PM, david buchanan <dmbuchanan at hotmail.com> wrote:

> 
> Marsha said:
> So, dmb, that would be "static patterns of value are ... ever-changing", not 'ever-changing static patterns'.  The misrepresentation changes the emphasis.
> 
> 
> dmb says:
> 
> It's oxymoronic nonsense either way. The terms are contradictory regardless of the order of their appearance. No matter which comes first in the equation, you are equating opposites.
> Why can you not see the simple logic of this objection? It seems to be fairly obvious to everyone else. 
> 
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html