[MD] The first cut.

[MarshaV]

Andre,

Not mentioned in this thread, on this topic, or even recently.  You're were misrepresenting what I stated.   Get a life...     


Marsha 







On Jan 23, 2012, at 9:40 AM, Andre wrote:

> Marsha to Andre:
> 
> I most certainly did not reference "DQ=sq" in any of these posts; that is another bit of misrepresentation on your part.
> 
> Andre:
> Trouble with your longer term memory Marsha? I invite anyone to dive into the archives where you have made that statement...more than once. Your reference to 'these posts' is your attempt at evasion (which is a usual tactic on your part). I am therefore not misrepresenting your belief. In fact, you once again state it:
> 
> "So to static quality does not differ from Dynamic Quality, and Dynamic Quality does not differ from static quality".
> 
> This may be true from a 'mystical' perspective but we are talking MOQ here which has a pragmatic, radical empiricist component in it. And for good reason. I invite you and any of your mystic friends to experience the difference between diving, head first, in a pool of water as contrasted with diving in a pool filled with ice. (amazing what difference one degree Celsius in temperature can make)
> 
> Sorry Marsha, not very convincing. I am afraid we are living in the temporal/spacial world of everyday affairs. You know, buying,selling,sneezing,working,fucking,farting,painting,thinking,dying...just to name a few. It is the world of everyday, conventional reality. That's the one we are living in and Pirsig's MOQ as a description of this temporal/spacial reality is brilliant because it incorporates everything (sq) and refers to nothing (DQ).  ;-)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html


 
___