[MD] Metaphysics and the mystic.

Joseph Maurer jhmau at comcast.net
Mon Jan 30 13:14:28 PST 2012


Hi Mark and All,

Metaphysics DQ/SQ is a format of reality.  In terms of format, the pattern
of the whole is greater than the sum of its parts and definition may include
the format of indefinable in a contrast of DQ and SQ.

Evolution is a metaphysical format in existence.  I accept DQ as indefinable
reality described in a logic of evolution.  DQ is indefinable reality
outside of subjective logic formatted as definable!  Metaphysics and
physics!  I know the indefinable formatted in evolution as a level in
existence DQ/SQ  

Definition becomes the format which must deny conceptual experience to
indefinable DQ experience.  DQ does not describe the first metaphysical
slice DQ/SQ.  DQ definition is illogical in the metaphysical format of
DQ/SQ.  

To me that says that there is a reality to logic in evolution. Between
physics DQ/SQ and metaphysics DQ.  DQ is formatted to remain outside of
conceptual reality which must be definable.  Metaphysics MOQ describes a
true format including an indefinable.  So much for mathematical dominance!
I can experience the indefinable reality in metaphysical logic, not
physically.  Word play!

DQ is indefinable not unknowable.

I become become restricted when describing the definable!  My metaphysics
becomes physics of mathematical logic.  Definition is sq formatted in
metaphysics! 

I would presume that Metaphysics is a word full of meaning.  DQ is
indefinable yet knowable in the sense that it contributes meaning formatted
to enhance our experience.  There is reality in some knowledge that is
indefinable.


On 1/29/12 4:12 PM, "118" <ununoctiums at gmail.com> wrote:

> You
> cannot find a motorcycle by taking it apart and analyzing all of its
> components, to see where exactly it is.  You cannot find the self for
> the same reasons.  Yet, we know that a home exists.   We know that we
> know; I Am, therefore I think.  We cannot know about such "knowing"
> since it is the "knowing" that gives the knowing our identity.
> 
> My answer is: Who knows, but it is fun to contemplate.  Something
> mysterious, outside of science and logic.  Perhaps spiritual
> rationalism will give us a better answer.





More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list