[MD] Is Quality a monism?

Joseph Maurer jhmau at comcast.net
Sun Jul 8 12:12:58 PDT 2012


Hi Jan and All,

At 79 skating on thin ice is not recommended.  Moq is thin ice!  Yet here I
am.  I can't guarantee that I will read a lot.  I think of emotions as a
level in evolution.

Inorganic, Organic 1, reproduction when cell splits into two cells, Organic
2, when reproduction occurs from a sperm cell penetrating an egg cell wall
in reproduction, Emotions DQ only, Intellect DQ/SQ, Higher emotion, DQ,
higher intellect, Heroes, DQ/SQ!.

It is odd that static quality reaches a higher level than dynamic quality.

Joe






On 7/7/12 1:02 PM, "Jan Anders Andersson" <jananderses at telia.com> wrote:

> In my book ( http://www.facebook.com/MoneyandtheArtofLosingControl ) where the
> MOQ is transformed into (un)practical examples I have drawn up some sort of
> map over 42 "classes" of emotions and how they are related to each other and
> maybe how static and dynamic Quality are working together. Learning them will
> probably keep you busy for a while. Hope you enjoy the story as well.
> 
> Best wishes





More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list