[MD] expanded rationality

[Joseph Maurer]

Hi Marsha,

Metaphysics and physics differ.  Acknowledging the incompleteness of what we
know creates static in metaphysics for a never ending investigation.  That
enhances physics as history has shown.

Accepting metaphysics as hypothetical questions the reality of knowledge.
DQ/SQ shrugs off definition by looking to experience for reality .  There is
something in my experience that is indefinable.  I do not know that I can
accept the indefinable as not existing in metaphysics?  Do I experience an
unnecessary logical convolution in DQ/SQ by accepting DQ as indefinable?

Joe  


On 7/13/12 1:30 AM, "MarshaV" <valkyr at att.net> wrote:

> Understanding static (patterned) value as hypothetical acknowledges the
> incompleteness of what we know and makes room for additional inquiry with new
> possibilities.  It certainly moves away from thinking of entities as existing
> inherently, and independent of thinking.