[MD] expanded rationality

[MarshaV]

Hi Joe,

Why do physicist bring together force, mass and energy?  What are they?  How are they the same?  How are they different.  What is being left out?  What does metaphysics, the MoQ, say about this description of reality?   :-)

Marsha
 


On Jul 13, 2012, at 2:46 PM, Joseph  Maurer <jhmau at comcast.net> wrote:

> Hi Marsha,
> 
> Metaphysics and physics differ.  Acknowledging the incompleteness of what we
> know creates static in metaphysics for a never ending investigation.  That
> enhances physics as history has shown.
> 
> Accepting metaphysics as hypothetical questions the reality of knowledge.
> DQ/SQ shrugs off definition by looking to experience for reality .  There is
> something in my experience that is indefinable.  I do not know that I can
> accept the indefinable as not existing in metaphysics?  Do I experience an
> unnecessary logical convolution in DQ/SQ by accepting DQ as indefinable?
> 
> Joe  
> 
> 
> On 7/13/12 1:30 AM, "MarshaV" <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
> 
>> Understanding static (patterned) value as hypothetical acknowledges the
>> incompleteness of what we know and makes room for additional inquiry with new
>> possibilities.  It certainly moves away from thinking of entities as existing
>> inherently, and independent of thinking.
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html