[MD] expanded rationality

[MarshaV]

Hi Joe,

Is 1/0 Really meaningless?  Doesn't it point to the indivisible, undefinable and unknowable, the 'not this, not that'?  Hmmmm.  What is h-constant?  
 

Marsha



On Jul 14, 2012, at 8:42 PM, Joseph  Maurer <jhmau at comcast.net> wrote:

> Hi Marsha and All,
> 
> Force, Mass, and Energy fall within the purview of mathematics for
> description.  1 is defined.  Mathematical logic cannot embrace evolution.
> In MOQ DQ is indefinable.  The mathematical logic of physics supports
> definition.  
> 
> The DQ/SQ logic of metaphysics is not bound in definition.  DQ remains
> indefinable, open to further curiosity in a description of reality.
> 
> Definition is not reality.  Definition is a calculated structure for
> reality.  DQ/SQ is not subject to mathematical manipulation.  The logic is
> wrong.  1 is meaningless in exposing DQ/SQ.  1/0 is meaningless.
> Physical/metaphysical description follows differing formats of DQ to enable
> DQ to remain indefinable.  Physics and Metaphysics describing reality and
> evolution do not allow the same disciplines in logic.  1/0 is illogical.
> 
> Joe
> 
> On 7/14/12 3:58 AM, "MarshaV" <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Why do physicist bring together force, mass and energy?  What are they?  How
>> are they the same?  How are they different.  What is being left out?  What
>> does metaphysics, the MoQ, say about this description of reality?   :-)
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html