[MD] expanded rationality
MarshaV
valkyr at att.net
Mon Jul 16 16:09:34 PDT 2012
Joe,
Yes, experience!
Marsha
On Jul 16, 2012, at 2:37 PM, Joseph Maurer <jhmau at comcast.net> wrote:
> Hi Marsha and All,
>
> "Nothing" and "indefinable" describe differing metaphysical reality.
> Indefinable does not interdict an experience of DQ. Nothing denies the
> experience of DQ.
>
> What is the balancing act of knowing the indefinable? Experience! You
> can't argue from not this/not that for a reality of DQ. In the metaphysical
> format of physics DQ is reality, while remaining indefinable.
>
> Negation does not affirm metaphysical reality, not this not that. Socrates
> became a metaphysician beyond the limits of a physician.
>
> Joe
>
> On 7/16/12 12:26 AM, "MarshaV" <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>
>> Knowing nothing made Socrates the wisest man, or so said the exalted Pythia of
>> Delphi, yet his was a mind of constant and fearless inquiry and testing. He
>> wasn't afraid of falsification; he seems to have welcomed it. Testing, one,
>> two, three, testing...
>
>
>
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list