[MD] expanded rationality

MarshaV valkyr at att.net
Mon Jul 16 16:09:34 PDT 2012


Joe,

Yes, experience!     


Marsha


On Jul 16, 2012, at 2:37 PM, Joseph  Maurer <jhmau at comcast.net> wrote:

> Hi Marsha and All,
> 
> "Nothing" and "indefinable" describe differing metaphysical reality.
> Indefinable does not interdict an experience of DQ.  Nothing denies the
> experience of DQ.  
> 
> What is the balancing act of knowing the indefinable?  Experience!  You
> can't argue from not this/not that for a reality of DQ.  In the metaphysical
> format of physics DQ is reality, while remaining indefinable.
> 
> Negation does not affirm metaphysical reality, not this not that. Socrates
> became a metaphysician beyond the limits of a physician.
> 
> Joe
> 
> On 7/16/12 12:26 AM, "MarshaV" <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
> 
>> Knowing nothing made Socrates the wisest man, or so said the exalted Pythia of
>> Delphi, yet his was a mind of constant and fearless inquiry and testing.  He
>> wasn't afraid of falsification; he seems to have welcomed it. Testing, one,
>> two, three, testing...   
> 
> 
> 




More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list