[MD] humpty dumpty

[MarshaV]

Ron/Tim,

Seems like you're doing a bit of the in-crowd shuffle.    Gangster rap to this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=leQY6hANO_c  


Marsha 





On Jul 30, 2012, at 11:39 AM, X Acto wrote:

> 
> 
> [Dan]
> Yes, certainly. And in our work-a-day world this is the norm. No disagreement from me. But Buddhism isn't interested in activity. It espouses non-activity. 
> 
> [Arlo]
> I don't pretend to be an expert on Buddhism, but I think this sounds right. I think I was going off part of the eightfold path (right view, right action) as to the mapping of 'belief' to 'activity' (as opposed to being divorced from activity, as is a general problem of S/O thinking).
> 
> (Ron)
> I would agree and it speaks to the bhuddist notion of 180 degree enllightenment in contrast to 360degree
> englightenment the hero's journey that returns home with a boon to society the moral of the Orphic mythos.
>  
> I do remember that in Bhuddism, inaction is considered a willful act wu wei, doing without doing, is 
> willful intention without direct action, so considered, the act of inaction and is put to practicle use in
> experience.
>  
> ..
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html


 
___