[MD] expanded rationality

MarshaV valkyr at att.net
Sun Jun 3 15:01:00 PDT 2012


Marsha:
What a post! Who talks like this? If you want to be taken seriously, Andre, then don't say crazy shit. 



On Jun 3, 2012, at 5:43 PM, Andre Broersen wrote:

> Andre said to Marsha:
> Do you actually know/feel what that means and what implications that has in terms of realizing an ego worth mentioning?
> 
> Andre:
> I am anticipating that you do not and that you have ready a smart-arsed comment of nothing. I am used to that.
> The above comment refers to a slightly expanded sense of self Marsha. A self that does not only determine things from within ones own egotistically centered sense of self but also incorporates other's perspectives that are commensurate within the context of what we are talking about.
> Now that is an ego worthy of talking with. But not so with yours.
> 
> I am talking about values.
> 
> But since you do not recognise value and have no idea of understanding the difference between value and Quality, since you have no acceptance of recognising this difference, this distinction, I mean afterall DQ is none other than sq, it maybe worth your while, nevertheless to recognise intellectual quality, as dmb presents it ...and social quality upon which basis you reject his quality intellectual posts.
> 
> Perhaps you need to mindfully contemplate this ego of yours (which you deny exists) within that process and try to be very honest.
> 
> Of course you wank yourself out of this one. Gawd the depths you go through to deny any responsibility for anything. Gawd, the depths you go through even denying you posted anything!
> 
> Shame on you really. Cowardice is a euphemism for your postings. Shame on you Marsha.
> 
> You are really not worth having around on this discuss. And I am truly sorry to say this.
 
 

___
 




More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list