[MD] Finite (SQ) and Infinite (DQ) Metaphysics

[ARLO JAMES BENSINGER JR]

[Arlo quoted Carse's Finite and Infinite Games]
"It is a highly valued function of society to prevent changes in the rules of the many games it embraces... Deviancy, however, is the very essence of culture. Whoever merely follows the script, merely repeating the past, is culturally impoverished. There are variations in the quality of deviation; not all divergence from the past is culturally significant. Any attempt to vary from the past in such a way as to cut the past off, causing it to be forgotten, has little cultural importance. Greater significance attaches to those variations that bring the tradition into view in a new way, allowing the familiar to be seen as unfamiliar, as requiring a new appraisal of all that we have been- and therefore all that we are. Cultural deviation does not return us to the past, but continues what was begun but not finished in the past... Properly speaking, a culture does not have a tradition; it is a tradition."

[dmb says:]
Yes, I think this passage expresses the importance of the contrarians, as Pirsig calls them. Pirsig adds some insights into the difference between evolutionary deviation and degenerate deviance.

[Arlo]
Yes, this is how I read this passage from Carse, I'm not sure what it is about this that Mark thinks the MOQ "dispels". I especially liked how Carse also notices the difference between variations in deviation (and the unintended "quality of deviation" phrasing). The last sentence, I think, could accurately be translated into MOQ language as "Properly speaking, a culture does not have static patterns of value, it is static patterns of value".