[MD] dark night

[MarshaV]

Hi Joe,

The context for my comment was quite an indictment of the intellect's shortcomings by Schopenhauer.  I think, though, that the value can be improved if the dualism implied by knowledge-of-some-thing is understood and remains as hypothetical. The MoQ is afterall a monism (with Quality the source of all that exists.)  At its highest, static (patterned) quality  may represent the best value available at the moment, but it does have its fallibilities  At least, imho.


Marsha

p.s.  I have always considered RMP an open heart surgeon.   



On Jun 24, 2012, at 4:41 PM, Joseph  Maurer <jhmau at comcast.net> wrote:

> Hi Marsha
> 
> Some things that I know yesterday (Passage of time) I question today!
> DQ(instantaneous)/SQ(delay)!  Singularity/duality!  DQ/SQ not DQ and SQ.
> There is duality in my experience.  I do not create the metaphysics DQ/SQ as
> differing entities.  I accepy duality in the existing intellect.  DQ
> indefinable/SQ definable.  Two not one.  My experience is my emotions DQ
> (self) and my intellect SQ (time).  I AM that I AM????
> 
> Joe
> 
> 
> 
> On 6/24/12 5:24 AM, "MarshaV" <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
> 
>> Little ole me:
>> I think it better to prefer 'not this; not that' - mental white noise - the
>> unknowable, indivisible and undefinable.  But then, I do like to dance.   :-). 
> 
> 
>