[MD] Is Quality a monism?

[Joseph Maurer]

Hi Andre and All,

Quite a diatribe!  DQ is not SQ and SQ is not DQ.  If DQ/SQ is the source of
knowledge and DQ and SQ are not definable as different then metaphysics are
not a different logical discipline from physics.  Mathematics and its
inability to describe evolution (one is not one) becomes the language of
metaphysics.  Metaphysics becomes a tempest in a teapot.

I am aware of DQ, and I am aware o SQ.  I think there is an analogical
awareness of existence describing the two, not a logical awareness of
existence.  Evolution describes levels in existence.  All individuals in
evolution do not have the same relationship to existence!

Joe  

On 6/28/12 2:09 PM, "Andre Broersen" <andrebroersen at gmail.com> wrote:

> It seems to me that DQ (on its own) is not, as you suggest unity, oneness,
> whole. Sq is, for the same reason not unity, oneness, whole. No, both are
> (Dq/sq). The simple reasoning being: how do you know unity, oneness, whole?
> They are static conceptions...and how are you aware of DQ except from a static
> point of view?