[MD] Is Quality a monism?

[118]

Hi Ron,
Perhaps a better question would be:

How do we know differentiation?

This may answer your question as to how we know oneness.

Sent laboriously from an iPhone,
Mark

On Jun 30, 2012, at 7:15 PM, X Acto <xacto at rocketmail.com> wrote:

> 
> 
> Ron asks:
> 
> Is Quality a Monism? firstly, it should be clear we are speaking of static quality and when we are speaking of monads we are speaking about unity, oneness, whole.
> It tends to lend to the idea of completeness.
> 
> Andre:
> It seems to me that DQ (on its own) is not, as you suggest unity, oneness, whole. Sq is, for the same reason not unity, oneness, whole. No, both are (Dq/sq). The simple reasoning being: how do you know unity, oneness, whole? They are static conceptions...and how are you aware of DQ except from a static point of view?
> (snip)
> To just continue Ron, for a small bit...in this conventional, static world the 'idea of completeness" shall remain an idea. All is provisional and shall..in time and space...remain representations (sq).
> 
> Ron replies:
> Thats a great philosophical question Andre, "how do you know unity,oneness,whole?" 
> you said we know them statically, which feels like the right direction. Quality then is the
> primary explanitory factor in our philosophical theories and in this way we can say that
> Quality is one because it is the basis and begining on which all explanation extends.
> But That is probably the only way I'd say that Quality is "one".
>  
> thnx Andre
>  
>  
>  
>  
> ,,
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html