[MD] Tweaking the emergence

[MarshaV]

On Mar 3, 2012, at 11:49 AM, 118 <ununoctiums at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Marsha,
> 
> Sent laboriously from an iPhone,
> Mark
> 
> On Mar 2, 2012, at 11:51 PM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Mark,
>> 
>> Even 'free will' is an intellectual static pattern of value.  If you like the pattern, than you do.  I do not like its association with the word 'will' which seems to suggest an entity acting from its own independent impetus, which I totally reject.
> 
> I do not see free will as static since it cannot be defined.
>> 
>> Concerning DQ, I cannot understand what you would expect me to say about that which is unknowable, undefinable and undividable?   'Not this, not that' seems most appropriate, and of course that would include not 'free will'.  But such a dynamic experience does establish a new appreciation for all static patterns, even 'free will'.  
>> 
> Well you seemed to have said a lot above.  Maybe more than you should have.  Free will is dynamic experience.  Every moment is choice.  Remember mindfulness?


Hi Mark,

There is no 'I' in mindfulness.


Marsha




> 
> Mark
>> 
>> Marsha
>> 
>> 
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html