[MD] First Division 2.0

[Joseph Maurer]

Hi Andre,

I did not realize I was upsetting you!  I am sorry!  In my last post
everything came through as though I was reposting.  Computers!

I do not know how you view SOM, nor your understanding of how MOQ is such a
huge clarification in metaphysics.  I am old and I apologize for a feeling
of dithering in my posts.  I accept logic!  The appeal to a logical base for
clarity can aid in covering greater territory.  I don't want to redefine the
wheel.

"The MOQ sees emotions as a biological response to quality AND NOT THE SAME
THING AS QUALITY" (my emphasis)."  DQ or SQ?

Definitions and an awareness like SOM and MOQ can be at odds in times of
metaphysical upheaval!  I would be happy to discuss a definition and the
evolutionary roots of Love.

Joe 





    


On 3/3/12 6:53 AM, "Andre" <andrebroersen at gmail.com> wrote:

> Andre:
> Right, I have brought this to the fore on many occasions but Joe just keeps on
> keeping on. Annotation 141 is very straight forward about this, as Dan says:
> "The MOQ sees emotions as a biological response to quality AND NOT THE SAME
> THING AS QUALITY"(my emphasis). I would almost suggest to anyone not agreeing
> with this to find their own space to argue this out. It is NOT in agreement
> with the MOQ to equate emotions with DQ...or Quality for that matter.
> And, for goodness sake, emotions CAN and ARE defined.