[MD] Why are things called patterns?

[MarshaV]

Mark,

And I was looking for clarification when I asked you to explain how I was using the term 'relationship' in an objective fashion.  If you do not understand what I say, figure it out for yourself, and have the experience for yourself, too.  There's nothing I can tell you.  In general, I am quite tired of you.  

 Marsha 
 
 




On Mar 12, 2012, at 12:24 PM, 118 <ununoctiums at gmail.com> wrote:

> Marsha,
> 
> My intention was not to ridicule, never is.  I simply asked for
> clarification so that I can understand what you are presenting.  I
> value different ways of saying things, but I cannot read your mind.
> 
> While I still do not understand your "habits that have turned into
> conventions", I will not bug you any more on this, and let Dan do the
> questioning.
> 
> Thank you for your response to this ignorant fool.
> 
> Mark
> 
> On 3/12/12, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>> 
>> Mark,
>> 
>> I mean habits that have turned into conventions.  Darn!  You allow yourself
>> different ways of saying something.  So when I try it, I get ridicule?  You
>> are like a noisy little child...
>> 
>> 
>> Marsha
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Mar 12, 2012, at 12:01 PM, 118 <ununoctiums at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Marsha and Dan,
>>> 
>>> OK, so now "patterns" are "conventional habits".  This still does not
>>> provide me with any clarity.  What pray tell are "conventional
>>> habits"?  One person's conventional habits can be another's mystery.
>>> Can I say that "conventional habits" are similar to "intuitive
>>> habits"?  This would make such habits more real than the intellectual
>>> patterns that "habits" are imbued with.  If not, please explain what
>>> you are trying to convey by "conventional habits".  It rhymes with
>>> "relational rabbits", this could be what you are saying, but I do not
>>> know.
>>> 
>>> What is an "unconventional habit?".  Perhaps by explaining that, I can
>>> deduce what a "conventional habit" is, as you use the term.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Mark
>>>