[MD] Conventional truth

[MarshaV]

Mark,

Baloney...  (see below.). 


Cheer,

Marsha 


On Mar 16, 2012, at 1:35 PM, 118 <ununoctiums at gmail.com> wrote:

> Practice comes from honest
> and open-minded discussion on the topics of MoQ, IMO.  All agendas
> should be left at the door.
> 
> For what it is worth,
> Mark



On Mar 7, 2012, at 12:52 PM, 118 <ununoctiums at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Mark:
> You mistake my intentions.  You need to figure it out for yourself, there is nothing I can tell you.
> 
> 
> On Mar 7, 2012, at 8:59 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>> 
>> Marsha:
>> Right,,, because it was a red-herring, asshole statement meant to get me to chase my tail.  No dice, Baby, start explaining!!!  
>> 
>> 
>> On Mar 7, 2012, at 11:45 AM, 118 <ununoctiums at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Mark:
>>> I see no reason to do this, figure it out on your own.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 3/7/12, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Marsha:
>>>> Explain how you think I am using relationships in an objective fashion?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Mar 7, 2012, at 11:33 AM, 118 wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Mark:
>>>>> No this is incorrect, you are using relationships in an objective fashion.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 3/7/12, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Marsha:
>>>>>> Static patterns of value can be understood as recurrent patterns of
>>>>>> interactions that arise simultaneously.  Such patterns are not objects in
>>>>>> any sense, but specific, recurring relationships.  This notion aligns
>>>>>> well with the Buddha's The Principle of  Conditionality: If this is, that
>>>>>> comes to be; from the arising of this, that arises; if this is not, that does
>>>>>> not come to be; from the stopping of this, that is stopped.
>>>>>> Marsha
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>