[MD] Why are things called patterns?

MarshaV valkyr at att.net
Sat Mar 17 23:49:11 PDT 2012


Ron & David,

I can't but wonder what's the point?  The dynamic is the fundamental nature of the static, but interesting story, nonetheless.  Is it the value judgement's value judgement?  All the way down?  


Marsha
 
 

On Mar 17, 2012, at 9:32 PM, David Harding <davidjharding at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Ron,
> 
>>> 
>>> [David]
>> 
>> The Metaphysics of Quality with all of it's levels and distinctions is an intellectual creation.
>> 
>> Ron:
>> Many would agree, with the caution of viewing the evolutionary aspect as what "is" or what
>> is "real" as bending toward an objective positivism which begins to run counter to the primary
>> understanding that as you say evolution is an intellectual pattern.
>> Many arguements twisted in misunderstanding and conflicting context have emerged from this.
>> Having said that, a note of caution also in regard to the statement that all experience is
>> intellectually derived, certainly some will want to attack on the the grounds of solopsism.
>> 
>> What can be said is that a MoQ is an intellectual idea about making good value distinctions.
> 
> Yes, and the MOQ is an intellectual value judgement itself.
> 
> -David.
> 
 
 
 


More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list