[MD] Why are things called patterns?

[Joseph Maurer]

Hi Andre and All,

Imho evolution is a twisted knot in existence.  DQ, indefinable, in
originating evolution creates a dual meaning DQ/SQ while remaining
indefinable. DQ/SQ is a metaphysical formulation for all reality not a
formula in physics.  In an indefinable,  definable relationship,  MOQ must
appeal to the indefinable when describing speculation in the
non-mathematical format, metaphysics DQ/SQ.

Poetically evolution surrounds SQ.  Evolution is not strong enough to define
its parent DQ. Only existence in reality has that power of definition.  DQ
exists, remaining indefinable in metaphysics.  SQ defines the rules of
relationship to indefinable DQ existence.  However the relationship remains
indefinable as one element of the relationship is indefinable.

Physics explores the embodiment of levels in existence DQ/SQ.

The logical theory for evolution DQ/SQ awaits definition.  The metaphysics
DQ/SQ uses indefinable/definable in a metaphysical setting not a physical
setting.  Physics the lower cannot define metaphysics the higher level.

Joe

On 3/19/12 9:19 AM, "Andre" <andrebroersen at gmail.com> wrote:

> "I have it that the fundamental nature of reality is DQ, and static patterns
> are overlaid upon DQ." what are you saying?