[MD] The value of static patterns.

MarshaV valkyr at att.net
Wed Mar 21 06:35:31 PDT 2012 


David,

This post is projection and utter nonsense.  

Static value exist because it is value.  Can't imagine an existence without value.  Can you?  


Marsha



On Mar 21, 2012, at 9:11 AM, David Harding <davidjharding at gmail.com> wrote:

> And here it is...
> 
> The final crux of the whole thing with Marsha...
> 
> She sees herself as Lila and all us 'Men' as the bumbling intellectuals.  You can't pare down that mystical Lila. No way. Not ever. Nuh uh.   Lila is DQ and Phaedrus the sq.  The sq can't capture the DQ. 
> 
> We 'Men' might be on here discussing the philosophy of Lila but Marsha on the other hand.... That's not what she's here for.  What she's doing is just the opposite.. She's living out the narrative of a book she likes - Lila.  
> 
> There's nothing on here stopping her from doing this of course.  It's just a mistake to think that you're discussing philosophy with her when she presents herself as doing so.. That's not her number one goal.  Her number one goal is role playing a book she likes.  Possibly her favourite book... Lila.  She's DQ! You can't pin her down!
> 
> There's one thing you're missing though Marsha... You forget one important thing about Lila...  She was insane.  She cared so little for the static patterns that existed that she ended up creating a complete other world of them and so went insane.  Hopefully you're sane enough to join us in a discussion of the value of sq? 
> 
> Now, static quality. What is that value?
> 
> -David.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 21/03/2012, at 11:36 PM, MarshaV wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 'What?'
>> 
>> 'I'm not going to answer any more of your questions.'
>> 
>> 'Why not?'
>> 
>> 'You're the detective. That's what you are. You think you're going to learn something. I don't know what, but you're not going to learn anything . . . You'll never find out who I am because I'm not anything.'
>> 
>> 'What do you mean?'
>> 
>> 'I'm not anybody. All these questions you're asking are just a waste of time. I know you're trying to find out what kind of a person I am but you're never going to find out anything because there's nothing to know.'
>> 
>> Her voice was getting slushy. She could tell it was getting slushy.
>> 
>> 'I mean, I used to play I was this kind of person and that kind of person but I got so tired of playing all those games. It's such work and it doesn't do any good. There's just all these pictures of who I am and they don't hold together. They're all different people I'm supposed to be but none of them are me. I'm not anybody. I'm not here. Like you now. I can see you've got a lot of bad impressions about me in your mind. And you think that what's in your mind is here talking to you but nobody's here. You know what I mean? Nobody's home. That's Lila. Nobody's home.’
>> 
>> 'You know what?' Lila said.
>> 
>> 'What?'
>> 
>> 'What you want to do is make me into something I'm not.'
>> 
>> 'Just the opposite.'
>> 
>> 'You think just the opposite. But you're really trying to do something to me that I don't like.'
>> 
>> 'What's that?'
>> 
>> 'You're trying to . . . you're trying to destroy me.'
>> 
>> 'No.'
>> 
>> 'Yes.'
>> 
>> 'Well, you've completely misunderstood what I'm asking these questions for,' the Captain said.
>> 
>> 'No, I haven't. I've completely understood it just exactly right,' Lila said. 'All men do that. You're no big exception. Jerry did it. Every man does it. But you know something? It won't work.'
>> 
>> 'I'm not trying to destroy you,' he said.
>> 
>> 'That's what you think. You're just playing around the edges, aren't you! You can't go to the center of me. You don't know where the center of me is!'
>> 
>> That set him back.
>> 
>> 'You're not a woman. You don't know. When men make love they're really trying to destroy you. A woman's got to be real quiet inside because if she shows a man anything they'll try to kill it.
>> 
>> 'But they all get fooled because there's nothing to destroy but what's in their own mind. And so they destroy that and then they hate what's left and they call what's left, "Lila," and they hate Lila. But Lila isn't anybody. That's true. You don't believe it, but it's true.
>> 
>> 'Women are very deep,' Lila said. 'But men never see it. They're too selfish. They always want women to understand them. And that's all they ever care about. That's why they always have to try to destroy them.'
>> 
>> 'I'm just asking questions,' the Captain said.
>> 
>> 'Fuck your questions! I'm whatever your questions turn me into. You don't see that. It's your questions that make me who I am. If you think I'm an angel then that's what I am. If you think I'm a whore then that's what I am. I'm whatever you think. And if you change your mind about me then I change too. So whatever Richard tells you, it's true. There's no way he can lie about me.'
>> 
>> Lila took the bottle and took a swig down straight. 'The hell with glasses,' she said. 'Everybody wants to turn Lila into somebody else. And most women put up with that, because they want the kids and the money and the good-looking clothes. But it won't work with me. I'm just Lila and I always will be. And if men don't like me the way I am, then men can just get out. I don't need them. I don't need anyone. I'll die first. That's just the way I am.'
>> 
>> After a while Lila looked around and saw that all the boats were lying straight in line just like the Captain said they would be. That's pretty good. He'd figured that out. She told him about it. He didn't say anything. He hadn't said anything for a long time.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>              (LILA, Chapter 14)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Mar 21, 2012, at 8:28 AM, David Harding wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Marsha,
>>> 
>>> Not really. What's the value of static patterns? I'm genuinely interested in both your viewpoints on this.  Static patterns represent death. Dynamic Quality is where it's at. Why should I bother with static quality?
>>> 
>>> -David.
>>> 
>>> On 21/03/2012, at 11:16 PM, MarshaV wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> David,
>>>> 
>>>> This is a rhetorical bit, right?  
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Marsha 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Mar 21, 2012, at 7:52 AM, David Harding <davidjharding at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Mark and Marsha,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Who likes static patterns? They're old and complex. They represent death... Pirsig says as much...
>>>>> 
>>>>> "They have no love. They offer no promise of anything. To succumb to them is to succumb to death, since that which does not change cannot live." - Lila
>>>>> 
>>>>> "(Static quality) is old and complex. It always contains a component of memory. Good is conformity to an established pattern of fixed values and value objects. Justice and law are identical. Static morality is full of heroes and villains, loves and hatreds, carrots and sticks. Its values don't change by themselves. Unless they are altered by Dynamic Quality they say the same thing year after year. Sometimes they say it more loudly, sometimes more softly, but the message is always the same." - Lila
>>>>> 
>>>>> Boring! YAWN!! I hate static patterns. They're so old and boring.  They don't change. Soo complex too. It makes my head hurt.  But then there's DYNAMIC QUALITY!! Ta DAA. That brings the change for the better that we want....
>>>>> 
>>>>> If I am to live my life, I'm going to follow Dynamic Quality and Dynamic Quality alone.  I'm going to ignore what static quality there is from the past and *Create* for the future and that's it.  Continually create things.  One thing after another. Entirely irrespective of those boring static patterns which exist already. That's the way to live my life! Just create - don't discover.. Forget static patterns. They suck. They're always about what did exist in past.  Who cares about the past? Let's look to the future to create for the future and the future alone!
>>>>> 
>>>>> What do you guys think?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Do you think there's any value in static patterns? Or should we always just keep our eyes on that undefinable Dynamic Quality and not worry about the static patterns of the past?
>>>>> 
>>>>> -David.
>>>>> 
>>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>>> Archives:
>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>> 
>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>> Archives:
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> 
>> 
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html

More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list