[MD] Moq_Discuss Digest, Vol 76, Issue 83

[MarshaV]

On Mar 21, 2012, at 11:05 AM, Antonio Roberto Maestrello <armaestrello at gmail.com> wrote:

> What's the matter if you find some Quality in static patterns? Can you
> reject them all *a priori*?
> Evolve is vary? Only that?
> Antonio Roberto'_
> 

"That’s the whole thing: to obtain static and Dynamic Quality simultaneously. If you don’t have the static patterns of scientific knowledge to build upon you’re back with the cave man. But if you don’t have the freedom to change those patterns you’re blocked from any further growth."
    (LILA, Chapter 17) 

Marsha:
Seems to me DQ permits the freedom to change, to evolve towards the better, but also destruct, which still would be for the better.   imho.  I am not sure if I've exactly addressed your post.