[MD] The value of static patterns.
118
ununoctiums at gmail.com
Thu Mar 22 10:28:26 PDT 2012
Hi David,
Sent laboriously from an iPhone,
Mark
On Mar 21, 2012, at 8:37 PM, David Harding <davidjharding at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
>> What is this 20 questions? I have no problem answering, but do you have any opinions of your own.
>
> Not really at the moment no.. I have written a bit in the past about my views on this but it just appears to fall on deaf ears so I'm just trying to get a better feel for the value you see in static patterns...
Cool. Like I said I will do my best to give you my opinion in the MoQ vernacular.
>
>>>>> Yeah, however what's best in the Western perspective?
>>>>
>>>> In my opinion, what is wrong with the Western perspective is written
>>>> about by Pirsig in ZAMM after Phaedrus goes to the "other side", and
>>>> is wandering the city. An alternative to that could be "best" for the
>>>> Western perspective. Thus MoQ.
>>>
>>> So there's nothing good in the current Western perspective?
>>
>> There is plenty good we are speaking of betterness within MoQ.
>
> What about a Western perspective without the MoQ. Is there any value in the static patterns there?
>
> -David.
Yes, there is high value there. It helps structure MoQ, which is a Western perspective.
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list