[MD] The value of static patterns.

118 ununoctiums at gmail.com
Thu Mar 22 10:28:26 PDT 2012


Hi David,

Sent laboriously from an iPhone,
Mark

On Mar 21, 2012, at 8:37 PM, David Harding <davidjharding at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Mark,
> 
>> What is this 20 questions?  I have no problem answering, but do you have any opinions of your own.
> 
> Not really at the moment no.. I have written a bit in the past about my views on this but it just appears to fall on deaf ears so I'm just trying to get a better feel for the value you see in static patterns...  

Cool.  Like I said I will do my best to give you my opinion in the MoQ vernacular.
> 
>>>>> Yeah, however what's best in the Western perspective?
>>>> 
>>>> In my opinion, what is wrong with the Western perspective is written
>>>> about by Pirsig in ZAMM after Phaedrus goes to the "other side", and
>>>> is wandering the city.  An alternative to that could be "best" for the
>>>> Western perspective.  Thus MoQ.
>>> 
>>> So there's nothing good in the current Western perspective? 
>> 
>> There is plenty good we are speaking of betterness within MoQ.
> 
> What about a Western perspective without the MoQ.  Is there any value in the static patterns there?
> 
> -David.

Yes, there is high value there.  It helps structure MoQ, which is a Western perspective.
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html



More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list