[MD] The value of static patterns.

[118]

Hi Dan,
Thank you for the appraisal of the letter.  I would assume it applies
to LS in general and not to the specific contributors therein.  At
least that is how the letter is written as far as I can tell.  He
speaks of MoQ considerations outside of the "norm".  I suppose we
could call these "insane" ideas.  Often posts in this forum can appear
"insane" due to the rhetoric being used.  However, they are far from
"insane" in the same way Phaedus was not truly insane.

Some who read my posts do not understand what I am presenting (dmb for
example).  The posts are not written for those who can only go by the
written word of the books or the academic authority within philosophy.
 For such posts rely on an intuitive understanding of Quality, to be
comprehended.  My hope is that someone out there gets something out of
my posts.  Maybe not now, but from the archives at least.  One is
enough.

I only know of one letter, and it is not insane.

Mark

On 3/22/12, Dan Glover <daneglover at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello everyone
>
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:23 AM, 118 <ununoctiums at gmail.com> wrote:
>> LOL indeed!  Have you read Pirsig's letter to the LS group?
>
> Hi Mark
>
> Unless you mean he has written a new letter that I am unaware of, I
> think you mean the letter to the OLD Lila Squad group... the one that
> had some really great contributors including Anthony McWatt, Doug
> Renselle, Horse, Keith Gillette, Magnus Berg, Bodvar Skutvik, Platt
> Holden, and many others... you can find that group chronicled in
> LILA'S CHILD.
>
> If he has indeed written a new letter, could you please point me to it?
>
> Dan
>
> http://www.danglover.com
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>