[MD] The value of static patterns.

Andre andrebroersen at gmail.com
Fri Mar 23 02:39:16 PDT 2012


Mark to Andre:
Thank you for your support as well.

Andre:
Any time Mark. No worries. I suppose I am one of those who doesn't recognize or appreciate your genius, for which I apologize. It truly takes one to know one. Which should tell you enough about me.

Lonely are we? Is that why you feel the need to respond to every poster here on this discuss? Yes, it confirms the cliche: It is lonely at the top.

Pity you are not impressed with psychology. I mean, they objectify/reify the ongoing dynamic which is taking place in your own head, right? Nice contribution of psychology however is that it holds up a mirror to reflect the outside, visible behavior of a person's 'inside' behavior. In other words, how does one's inside behavior manifest itself? This can be threatening I know. And perhaps this is why you are so dismissive of the profession.

You should really see one Mark in hope that this person can help you stop pulling the wool over your own eyes every time you post. I am sure you have heard of noticing the splinter in everyone else's eye and not perceiving the wooden beam in your own?

The drivel you spout to Dan, for example:
"The "paranoia" is simply that you do not see MoQ going your way.  This is called "stuckness".  Perhaps your time has come and gone, but I think you can still contribute some exciting new ideas to keep MoQ dynamic.  Give it a try!"

Gawd Mark, you are so fucking full of yourself it really is embarrassing. In your hands DQ has attained another meaning: Drivel Quality, high quality drivel of the absolute lowest sort.

I'll repeat your squirt to Dan: "This is not an insult, it is encouragement.  I wish to support you."

Your condescending wanking really makes me feel sorry for you. Get help Mark. Professional help!






More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list