[MD] Why are things called patterns?

[Joseph Maurer]

Hi Mark,

Imho There is one meaning for cognition which follows a logic for physical
reality dependent on mathematical logic for verification, physics.

There is a further meaning in cognition which accepts DQ/SQ metaphysics.
Evolution is beyond mathematical physics.

Mathematics a lower level can not verify the higher level metaphysics.  The
defined vocabulary of mathematics is inadequate.

DQ/SQ metaphysics is proposed as indefinable/definable reality evolution.
The appeal to DQ/SQ, levels in existence, is beyond mathematics. Evolution
defines logic in verifying levels in existence, metaphysics.

DQ/SQ metaphysics accepts verification for evolutionary levels in existence.
There is no physically describable manifestation which verifies this
definition of observable evolution.  A metaphysical format accepts
indefinable reality DQ, in evolution DQ/SQ.

DQ/SQ is the cognitive description of evolution which embraces the
metaphysical logic of levels in existence.  Evolution describes a reality
beyond the one size fits all logic of mathematics.

Joe



On 3/23/12 10:06 PM, "118" <ununoctiums at gmail.com> wrote:

> If everything is cognitive, then how does one follow DQ?  You say "well that
> is a cognitive argument", and I say "no, it is dependent drift", and the
> conversation becomes totally meaningless.