[MD] Drivel v MOQ

[Tuukka Virtaperko]

Horse,
I did this:

-Mary says you censored her message from here. I suspected it was stuck 
in a spam filter.

-I posted Mary's message, which was intended to be posted here, as a 
citation within my message, which was longer

As you can see, I didn't cross-post, as in, "to send the same message in 
multiple mailing lists".

If Mary was right and you censored her message, I have less of a problem 
with this. I will understand censorship, even though I wouldn't agree 
with you that it is needed. But here you are asking me to follow a rule 
which I do not understand. I did not cross post in the first place.

I cannot adhere to rules I don't understand. How long, either 
percentually or regarding the amount of words, must a citation be in 
order to qualify as cross posting? If a message is only ten words long, 
would it be cross posting to copy that message and send it as a citation 
in another message, which is a hundred words long?

-Tuukka




25.3.2012 5:13, Horse wrote:
> Tuuka
>
> Please do not cross post from other lists.
>
> Horse
>