[MD] Drivel v MOQ

[MarshaV]

And, dmb, if you were concerned about what RMP has written, maybe you can heed Annotation 140, if not your credibility is zilch.   Maybe it's too late to turn that around.  You seem to have forged deep patterns of nastiness.  




On Mar 25, 2012, at 1:10 PM, MarshaV wrote:

> 
> 
> dmb,
> 
> 
> On Mar 25, 2012, at 12:48 PM, david buchanan wrote:
> 
>> dmb:
>> "In the past Pheadrus' own radical bias caused him to think of Dynamic Quality alone (as you seem to be doing Marsha) and neglect static patterns of quality (as you seem to be doing Marsha). 
> 
> 
> Marsha:
> Why, because you think so?   I do not value your opinion, and your point-of-view is not interesting to me.  You seem to think progress is agreeing with you.   There are multiple ways to experience the MoQ.  I am interested in the MoQ as a bridge between the East and West.  From RMP's initial interest in Northrop's 'Meeting of East and West: An Inquiry Concerning World Understanding' and his recommendation of Steve Hagan's book ‘Buddhism: Plain and Simple’, I think he is quite interested in accommodating both East and West philosophies.  
> 
> 
> Marsha 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html


 
___