[MD] Drivel v MOQ
Ian Glendinning
ian.glendinning at gmail.com
Mon Mar 26 01:53:22 PDT 2012
No idea who said it, but to be fair DMB that contradiction is the
standing problem with a discussion group whose subject is beyond words
- it's all about claims that transcend words - a tricky game..
Ian
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 8:39 PM, david buchanan <dmbuchanan at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Either Marsha or Mark said:
> Yes, my posts are meant for those who wish for a way out of the static world of thought. The idea is to free oneself from words.
>
> dmb says:
> This is another good example. First you have the delusional grandiosity wherein the poster claims to transcend the normal limits of thoughts and words and then you have the logical incoherence of the claim. Reading or writing to free yourself from words is like driving your car around to free yourself from fuel consumption. It is a humorously conspicuous performative contradiction. In other words, it's so stupid that it's funny.
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list