[MD] qualified relativists

[ridgecoyote at gmail.com]

Aha, I see.  Foiled by my own predilictions again. :-). Thanks Mark for clarifying. 

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 26, 2012, at 3:49 PM, 118 <ununoctiums at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi John,
> Yes, I agree.  Quality for an electron may be different than human quality.
> 
> I simply was giving Tuukka another word for what he was presenting since he requested an alternative term.  Re-read his post that I was responding to and you may understand why I suggested the word anthropocentric.
> 
> I was not making any categorical statement concerning MoQ.
> 
> Cheers,
> Mark
> 
> Sent laboriously from an iPhone,
> Mark
> 
> On Mar 26, 2012, at 2:42 PM, ridgecoyote at gmail.com wrote:
> 
>> Mark, 
>> 
>> Huh?
>> 
>>> Hi Tuukka,
>>> I would use the term "anthropocentric".  This means that the way we
>>> see things is the way they must be.  While this can be seen as
>>> completely true, sometimes it is taken too far in my opinion.
>>> Mark
>> 
>> My ears always perk up at the term because my philosophical mentor, George Sessions, who introduced me to RMP, Gary Snyder and Ed Abbey and other important influences in my life made his rep and wrote his masters on "Anthropocentrism and the Environment". His thesis fascinated me then and ever since. Anthropocentrism just means human centered. And i see it definitely as NOT the way things really are, but the way humans see them, or would like to see them. 
>> 
>> John
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html