[MD] DMB's friends

[Joseph Maurer]

Hi Mark,

A mathematical conception of DQ is ambivalent.  Metaphysics follows a
reality of perception prior to the logic of conception.  There is a
difference between the perception of metaphysics and the conception of
mathematical logic.  In MOQ there is no definition of DQ.

IMHO DQ is the perception of indefinable existence.  Indefinable DQ
perceives a base in existence for a definable mathematical logic.  DQ is
perception.  Perception cannot be negated by a mathematical procedure,
definition.  Logic follows the further perception to evolution as levels in
existence. 

DQ is existential.  It does not beg definition in mathematical logic.  This
is contrary to the perception of metaphysical DQ.  Indefinable DQ is the
proposal of metaphysical reality as true and not subject to a review by
definition only a contradictory DQ. The logic of mathematics is a logic of
definition.  The rigorous logic of mathematics is a sharp focus for
attention!  

In MOQ, DQ is indefinable and knowable reality.  It is impossible to define
DQ since being indefinable is the declaration of DQ in the origin of
metaphysics.  Definition and perception follow different disciplines.

DQ's relationship to logic is as an indefinable element of quality placing
it outside strict logic when viewed as evolution levels in existence.

Quality is confusing.  In SOM metaphysics Quality is an adjective.  In MOQ
Quality is noun DQ/SQ.  All definable physical reality can be described in
mathematical terms.  DQ is indefinable!   The Metaphysics of Quality.

Mathematics and evolution use a different logic in existence.  In
mathematics existence is existence.  IMHO Evolution describes levels in
existence.  

DQ/SQ are not the same by definition.  By definition metaphysics is outside
physics. Metaphysics precedes a mathematical logic of definitions.  DQ
levels of existence in reality  describes evolution.

Joe


On 3/26/12 3:55 PM, "118" <ununoctiums at gmail.com> wrote:

> Mathematics and language are one and the same.