[MD] FW: Dewey's Zen
Carl Thames
cthames at centurytel.net
Tue Mar 27 19:50:09 PDT 2012
It's been a while since I read Lila, so I didn't grasp the term "Cleveland
Harbor Effect" when you used it. I did a search on it, and came up with:
http://www.quantonics.com/Pirsigs_Lila_Quotes_on_Insanity.html
This essay addresses many parts of this message. I'm going to have to read
it a couple of times to come to some kind of understanding about it, but I
think it's well worth the effort.
Carl
----- Original Message -----
From: "david buchanan" <dmbuchanan at hotmail.com>
To: <moq_discuss at moqtalk.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2012 4:39 PM
Subject: [MD] FW: Dewey's Zen
>
> Thanks for playing along, gents. Just about everyone seems to be reading
> it the same way I do. Ant totally nailed it, of course, and it seems safe
> to consider my hunch pretty well confirmed. I was fairly confident already
> but we always gotta watch out for the Cleveland Harbor Effect and other
> kinds of confirmation bias. I'll take a turn playing the game too. My
> additions are bracketed in the passages below:
>
>
>
> ...experiences come whole [undivided or undifferentiated], pervaded by
> unifying qualities [Quality as an aesthetic continuum] that demarcate them
> within the flux of our lives [what James and Pirsig call "the immediate
> flux of life"]. If we want to find meaning [intellectual quality], or the
> basis for meaning, we must therefore start with the qualitative unity
> [undivided Quality or Dynamic Quality] that Dewey describes. The
> demarcating pervasive quality is, at first, unanalyzed [Quality is
> pre-intellectual experience], but it is the basis for subsequent analysis,
> thought, and development. Thought [intellectual experience] starts from
> this experienced whole [begins with DQ], and only then does it introduce
> distinctions [static concepts and definitions] that carry it forward as
> inquiry.
> It is not wrong to say that we experience objects, properties,
> and relations, but it is wrong to say that these are primary in experience
> ["subjects and objects are secondary. They are concepts derived from
> something more fundamental" (Lila 364)]. What are primary are pervasive
> qualities of situations ["the immediate flux of life which furnishes the
> material to our later reflection with its conceptual categories" (Lila
> 365)], within which we subsequently discriminate objects, properties, and
> relations.
>
> Dewey took great pains to remind us that the primary locus of human
> experience is not atomistic sense impressions, but rather what he called a
> "situation," by which he meant, not just our physical setting, but the
> whole complex of physical, biological, social, and cultural conditions
> that constitute any given experience—experience taken in its fullest,
> deepest, richest, broadest sense.
> [Compare that whole sentence (above) to Pirsig's: "If you compare the
> levels of static patterns that compose a human being to the ecology of a
> forest, and if you see the different patterns sometimes in competition
> with each other, sometimes in symbiotic support of each other, but always
> in a kind of tension that will shift one way or the other, depending on
> evolving circumstances, then you can also see that evolution doesn't take
> place only within societies, it takes place within individuals too. Lila
> then becomes a complex ecology of patterns moving toward Dynamic Quality."
> (Lila 360)]
>
> Mind, on this view, is neither a willful creator of experience [subjective
> idealism], nor is it a mere window to objective mind-independent reality
> [scientific objectivity]. Mind is a functional aspect of experience [mind
> is a process, not a thing] that emerges when it becomes possible for us to
> share meanings [evolved as language], to inquire into the meaning of a
> situation, and to initiate action that transforms, or remakes, that
> situation [betterness is the purpose of social and intellectual static
> quality].
>
>
> The pervasive quality of a situation is not limited merely to sensible
> perception or motor interactions [pre-intellectual experience is not
> merely raw sense data]. Thinking is action, and so "acts of thought" also
> constitute situations [there is a dynamic cutting edge of experience even
> within the static conceptual world] that must have pervasive qualities.
> Even our best scientific thinking stems from the grasp of qualities ["the
> MOQ also says that DQ [is] the value force that chooses an elegant
> mathematical solution to a laborious one, or a brilliant experiment over a
> confusing, inconclusive one.. It is the cutting edge of scientific
> progress itself." (Lila 365-6)]
>
> [And finally, my favorite....]
>
> The crux of Dewey's entire argument is that what we call
> thinking, or reasoning, or logical inference could not even exist without
> the felt qualities of situations: "The underlying unity of qualitativeness
> regulates pertinence or relevancy and force of every distinction and
> relation; it guides selection and rejection and the manner of utilization
> of all explicit terms."
>
> ["The preselection of facts is not based on subjective, capricious
> "whatever you like" but on Quality, which is reality itself. ... It is the
> source of subjects and objects and exists in an anterior relationship to
> them. It is not capricious, it is the force that opposes capriciousness;
> THE ORDERING PRINCIPLE OF ALL SCIENTIFIC AND RATIONAL THOUGHT which
> destroys capriciousness, and without which no scientific thought can
> proceed." (Pirsig in ZAMM)]
>
>
> Now I'm hoping this forms the basis of some good discussion. It offers a
> fresh terms and a new look at the MOQ's central terms and distinctions.
>
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2114/4897 - Release Date: 03/27/12
>
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list