[MD] Contradiction and incoherence

[MarshaV]

Hello Ian,

Anthony commented on an email I sent to Mark.  To Anthony I was trying to be very clear that I am following what I find interesting and important.  

I think Anthony is great.  I hope he knows that.  His Ph.D. thesis and the MoQ are both documents I value highly.  The dvds, too, are outstanding.  I also think his post in the 'Dewey's Zen' thread was excellent.  


Marsha 



On Mar 29, 2012, at 5:08 AM, Ian Glendinning <ian.glendinning at gmail.com> wrote:

> Marsha,
> 
> Your response to Ant was NOT answering Mark's questions.
> 
> #5
> Over and out.
> Ian
> 
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 10:06 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>> 
>> Ian,
>> 
>> Depends how you interpret the emails.  I am not hung up on anything.  You cannot see me, so you are the mirror of interpretation.  I am following what I find interesting.  I imagine you are doing the same, at least I hope so.  Usually, I am merely answering Mark's questions.
>> 
>> 
>> Marsha
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Mar 29, 2012, at 4:53 AM, Ian Glendinning <ian.glendinning at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Marsha,
>>> 
>>> The email record suggests otherwise ;-)
>>> Prove it otherwise. Chill.
>>> 
>>> Ian
>>> (PS that two-liner was my 4th mail of the day.)
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 9:50 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Ian,
>>>> 
>>>> I am not hung up on anything.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Marsha
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Mar 29, 2012, at 4:43 AM, Ian Glendinning <ian.glendinning at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Marsha,
>>>>> 
>>>>> That was a weird riposte to Ant - who I though articulated the
>>>>> Pirsig's position pretty well (IMHO) irrespective of which specific
>>>>> quotes he brought to the table.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The nearest thing to a "demand" was not to get too hung up on it.
>>>>> Why do you have to turn it into some anti-Marsha fight ?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Ian
>>>>> 
>>>>>