[MD] A problem with the MOQ.

[Tuukka Virtaperko]

Joe, all,

> Joe said:
>
> In a metaphysical discussion you can't presume a definition.


Tuukka:
Yes you can, but the definition has no truth beyond the fact that it has 
been presumed. I would rather say, that the truthfulness of metaphysical 
assertions is arbitrary - they should always be judged on other grounds 
than truthfulness. For example, a metaphysical theory may be consistent 
or inconsistent, or symmetric or asymmetric, more inclusive or less 
inclusive, more elegant or less elegant, regardless of its truth value.

Tuukka