[MD] reifying carrots
MarshaV
valkyr at att.net
Wed May 2 01:14:46 PDT 2012
Greetings,
I am more and more convinced that conceptualization is the twin reification of self (subject) and other (object). As such it would say something significant about ALL static patterns from the inorganic level to the intellectual level: All patterns, all levels - inorganic, biological, social & intellectual - are conventionally, indeed, statically, subject-object oriented.
"Mystification, in the concept of reification, is basic to the sociology of knowledge. Berger and Luckmann (1966, 89f) make a distinction, similar to the Buddhist analysis of self-identity, between two levels of reification, one implicit and unreflective and the other explicit and cultivated. Reification is
the apprehension of the products of human activity as if they were
something else than human products—such as facts of nature, results
of cosmic laws, or manifestations of divine will... Reification is possible
on both the pretheoretical and theoretical levels of consciousness...
it would be an error to limit the concept of reification to the mental
construction of intellectuals. Reification exists in the consciousness of
the man in the street and, indeed, the latter presence is more practically
significant. It would also be a mistake to look at reification as a perversion
of an originally non-reified apprehension of the social world, a sort of
cognitive fall from grace. On the contrary, the available ethnological and
psychological evidence seems to indicate the opposite, namely, that the
_original apprehension of the social world is highly reified both phylogenetically
and ontogenetically._ (emphasis added)
That is to say, consistent with our main thesis, that we know the world by means of our evolved capacities to reify experience into the categories of language and social and cultural life. These are both fundamental and fundamentally obscuring."
(Waldron, William, 'Common Ground, Common Cause')
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list